Part 1: Suspected Big Baby? Ignorance Is Bliss

by | Oct 17, 2015 | Pregnancy Issues and Concerns

“Perceptions of fetal size influence interventions in pregnancy, BU study finds,” reads the EurekAlert article title. This is hardly breaking news, as every other study of suspected macrosomia has found the same thing; however, this latest study confirms the role of clinician bias.

Using data from Listening to Mothers III, a survey of  U.S. women giving birth in 2011-2012, investigators looked at the subgroup of 1960 women with no prior cesarean and compared the 566 participants who responded “yes” to the question “Did your maternity care provider tell you that your baby might be getting quite large?” with the rest. While 1/3 of  the women were told that their babies might be big, only 10% delivered a baby weighing 4000 g (8 lb 13 oz) or more, the usual definition for macrosomia. Among women given this news, only 20% had babies in the macrosomic weight range.

Predictably, suspected big baby resulted in more inductions (70% vs. 51%), both medical (60% vs. 40%) and self-induction attempts (43% vs. 25%). Not so predictably, it didn’t increase cesarean rate (22% vs. 18%), although it did increase the number of women wanting (33% vs. 7%) and having (13% vs. 6%) a scheduled cesarean.

Investigators found that race (35-38% women of color vs. 27% white women), payment source (self-pay 46%, private 34%, public 27%), BMI (42% BMI > 30 vs. 28% BMI 19-25), and gestational diabetes (GD) status (65% yes vs. 15% no) strongly influenced whether women would be told their baby would be big; however, the actual percentage with infants weighing 4000 g or more failed abysmally to justify the prediction: 8-10% women of color vs. 11% white, 6% self-pay vs. 10% private vs. 11% public. Even with factors associated with higher birthweight, the true association was much weaker than clinicians thought: 15% BMI > 30 vs. 8% BMI 19-25; 15% GD vs.9% no GD. In other words, women were diagnosed and treated according to unfounded clinician beliefs.

Women also, point out the study authors, weren’t treated according to the evidence. They noted that studies consistently find fetal weight estimates to be unreliable enough to be clinically useless, and ACOG guidelines reject suspected macrosomia as an indication for induction or planned cesarean except when fetal weight estimates predict birthweight greater than 5000 g (11 lbs 1 oz.).

The Take-Away:

  1. Ask prospective care providers their practices and policies when they think the baby may be bigger than average. Possible problem: ascertaining this may be impractical in big practices.
  2. Consider refusing fetal weight estimates. Possible problem: the damage may already be done by the time the doctor or midwife suggests it.
  3. Take care provider concern about having a big baby with a shaker full of salt. Stay calm, and carry on.

If given this news, cover bets by seeking information from knowledgeable sources on how to best to promote safe, physiologic birth with a bigger baby. None of the tips will do any harm if the baby isn’t super-size after all.

Take Charge of Your Birth

Labor Pain What's Your Best Strategy Henci Goer

The first in Henci’s new Take Charge of Your Birth Series, Labor Pain: What’s Your Best Strategy? delivers up-to-date access to the best medical research plus practical strategies for developing your plan and putting it into action. Also available in audiobook.

Get Our Free E-Book

The Thinking Woman's Guide To Optimal Maternity Care

This groundbreaking ebook provides pregnant people and their partners benchmarks for choosing a birth place and guidance on how to select care providers who support an evidence-based, physiologic approach. It identifies the gaps between typical labor management and optimal care and gives sage advice on how to find care they can trust.